top of page
  • Writer's pictureRalph Goodwin

DJT Legal Beagles Absence Of Color

Updated: Sep 1, 2022

Editorial Opinion By Ralph Goodwin, CEO Plus-1 News Central

AUG 30TH

Respectfully Published By : Ralph Charles SQYX Goodwin : Plus-1 News Editor-In-Chief

AS REVIEWED BY PLUS-1 NEWS CENTRAL WEBSITE TEAM

It Is Not Prohibited By Law To Be Dumb (As In Being Simply Obstreperously Stupid)

- But -

Being Dumb Is Not A Lawful Excuse Against A Citation Of Crime

A QUESTION REGARDING LOST PRIVILEGE - FPOTUS TRUMP LEGAL TEAM DUTY OF CARE

General References Provide As Follows : "Generally, in order for the attorney-client privilege to apply, there must be an attorney-client relationship and the communication must be made by the client in confidence for the purpose of obtaining legal advice. It does not matter whether the information is communicated orally, in writing, or by nonverbal communication, such as nodding the head. The privilege also applies to information provided by the attorney to the client.

Not only must there be an attorney-client relationship, but the communication must be related to the seeking of legal advice. As a result, it might be concluded that communications do not fall within the scope of the attorney-client privilege based on the extent to which the client is seeking business advice or technical advice. Also, because the communications must be in confidence, if a third party not having a common interest is allowed to be present during the communications or if it is intended that the communications be delivered to a third party, the attorney-client privilege will not apply.".


Someone Seems To Have Lost Their Entitlement To Seek To Have A Special Master Installed To Review The Documents In Possession Of The DOJ, As Provided Through The FBI Executed Search Warrant.

Subsequent To The Further In-House At FBI / DOJ Florida Regional HQ, There Were Additional ACP Retrievals And Returns To DJT Attorneys.

Common Sense Conclusion : The DJT Attorney(s) Declared By Signature That All FBI Seized Documents Were Undertaken Via The Search Warrant. There Was Not Any Known Residual Right Of ACP Challenge At The Mar A Lago Site ---- In Particular, Noting That The DJT Attorney(s) Had Previously And On Aug 8 2022 Asserted That There Were No Prohibited Documents Retained By DJT At Mar A Lago. Following These Events, DJT Attorney(s) Attended Court Hearings On The Matter Of These Seized Documents; Sitting In Silence.

The Assignment Of A Special Master To Review The DOJ Documents Of Record From Mar A Lago Appears To Be Moot; And, Not Within DJT Entitlement.

SEP 1ST

AS REVIEWED BY PLUS-1 NEWS CENTRAL WEBSITE TEAM


22 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page